Validate plan, team and quotations
R$30,000Portion of capital sought associated with this stage’s plan. Actual release depends on contracts, conditions and the financial provider.
Sofia · Belo Horizonte, MG
Illustrative case study with a fictional character and hypothetical amounts.

Sofia coordinates a nonprofit that shelters street dogs and organizes responsible adoption. The project needs expanded temporary shelter, qualified veterinary care and food and hygiene through recovery and adoption. Its budget separates infrastructure, care and operations. The goal is to make funding needs and deliverables verifiable to supporters while protecting volunteer and adopter privacy.
Capital is part of the plan. Before seeking funds, the owner organizes the problem, compares alternatives and identifies spending that can be delayed, reduced or met from own resources. The presentation should distinguish verified facts from execution assumptions.
Each line connects to purpose and execution evidence.
Nominal example amounts. Actual costs, fees, taxes and contracting expenses need to be determined for a real transaction.
Hypothetical 12-week assessment schedule. Actual timing and conditions depend on the project.
Portion of capital sought associated with this stage’s plan. Actual release depends on contracts, conditions and the financial provider.
Portion of capital sought associated with this stage’s plan. Actual release depends on contracts, conditions and the financial provider.
Portion of capital sought associated with this stage’s plan. Actual release depends on contracts, conditions and the financial provider.

In the nonprofit case, supporting rescue and adoption differs from acquiring equity or receiving interest. The instrument identifies purpose, permitted uses, responsibilities and reporting. Any real debt proposal needs separate assessment of payment source, authority and sustainability; a donation does not imply financial return.
KEZS organizes technology and intermediation. It does not assign a score or decide whether an investor should accept this risk. Diligence is independent and capital may suffer partial or total loss. Applicable providers need to be identified before contracting.
The study shows how a need becomes a budget, stages and criteria. It does not demonstrate approval, completed funding or business results. A real transaction may require structural changes, further information and different terms. The method’s value lies in making questions visible before committing capital.
Integrity and traceability records help preserve versions and confirmed events. They do not replace verification of documents and financial confirmations. Participant privacy should be preserved even when a project presentation is public.
Understand what to prepare, compare and monitor.
Start by working to connect every contribution to care, shelter and responsible adoption. Connect the purpose to a budget and verifiable milestones before negotiating terms.
Nonprofit governing documents and authority; Work plan and staged budget; Receipts and execution records. Share only necessary information with authorized participants and verify the submitted version.
Care costs exceeding budget; Adoptions slower than planned; Insufficient shelter and team capacity. Each funder performs their own assessment; KEZS provides no score or approval guarantee.
Yes. The model considers businesses of every size from their first day of registration. Limited history requires other evidence. A project does not guarantee approval or funding availability.
Planning examples range from R$2,000 to R$20 million. Budgets should reflect actual needs and available own funds. Terms and contributions depend on the transaction and participants.
Agree on milestones, responsibilities, documents and metrics. Separate forecasts, available cash and confirmed financial events. Technology supports history without guaranteeing business outcomes or payment.


